WallStSmart

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)vsTotalEnergies SE ADR (TTE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TotalEnergies SE ADR generates 462% more annual revenue ($183.96B vs $32.72B). DUK leads profitability with a 15.7% profit margin vs 8.2%. TTE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.72. TTE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

DUK

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.0Value: 4.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52

TTE

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.5Value: 7.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.91

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$94.40B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.5%

TTE6 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
57.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 57.1% YoY

Market CapQuality
$195.51B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.728/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
13.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
20.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.3%

Areas to Watch

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.663/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.542/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.58B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

TTE4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.4%4/10

3.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.914/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.24B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.7% and operating margin at 25.5%. Revenue growth of 11.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TTE

The strongest argument for TTE centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.72 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.66 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TTE

The primary concerns for TTE are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DUK profiles as a mature stock while TTE is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

DUK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.40 — expect wider price swings.

DUK is growing revenue faster at 11.3% — sustainability is the question.

TTE generates stronger free cash flow (-1.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TTE scores higher overall (72/100 vs 67/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

TotalEnergies SE ADR

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

TotalEnergies SE is a global integrated oil and gas company. The company is headquartered in Paris, France.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?