WallStSmart

EDAP TMS SA (EDAP)vsMcKesson Corporation (MCK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

McKesson Corporation generates 544546% more annual revenue ($403.43B vs $74.07M). MCK leads profitability with a 1.2% profit margin vs -41.7%. MCK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.44. MCK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).

EDAP

Avoid

25

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0

MCK

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 5.40
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EDAPUndervalued (+41.7%)

Margin of Safety

+41.7%

Fair Value

$8.41

Current Price

$4.31

$4.10 discount

UndervaluedFair: $8.41Overvalued
MCKSignificantly Overvalued (-69.6%)

Margin of Safety

-69.6%

Fair Value

$561.89

Current Price

$775.66

$213.77 premium

UndervaluedFair: $561.89Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EDAP0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

MCK5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-3.9710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.4010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Market CapQuality
$88.56B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

EPS GrowthGrowth
37.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 37.2% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.31B8/10

Generating 3.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

EDAP4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Market CapQuality
$156.30M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

PEG RatioValuation
90.472/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-124.0%2/10

ROE of -124.0% — below average capital efficiency

MCK3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.2%3/10

1.2% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EDAP

Revenue growth of 13.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MCK

The strongest argument for MCK centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. PEG of 1.44 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : EDAP

The primary concerns for EDAP are Price/Book, Market Cap, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : MCK

The primary concerns for MCK are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 1.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EDAP profiles as a turnaround stock while MCK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MCK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.35 — expect wider price swings.

EDAP is growing revenue faster at 13.9% — sustainability is the question.

MCK generates stronger free cash flow (3.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MCK scores higher overall (55/100 vs 25/100). EDAP offers better value entry with a 41.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

EDAP TMS SA

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION · USA

EDAP TMS SA, develops, produces, markets, distributes and maintains a portfolio of minimally invasive medical devices for the treatment of urological diseases in Asia, France, the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Lyon, France.

McKesson Corporation

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION · USA

McKesson Corporation is an American company distributing pharmaceuticals and providing health information technology, medical supplies, and care management tools.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?