EDAP TMS SA (EDAP)vsMcKesson Corporation (MCK)
EDAP
EDAP TMS SA
$4.31
+0.23%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $156.30M
MCK
McKesson Corporation
$881.51
+0.07%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $102.78B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
McKesson Corporation generates 554743% more annual revenue ($410.98B vs $74.07M). MCK leads profitability with a 1.1% profit margin vs -41.7%. MCK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.66. MCK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 43/100 (D).
EDAP
Avoid25
out of 100
Grade: F
MCK
Hold43
out of 100
Grade: D
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+41.7%
Fair Value
$8.41
Current Price
$4.31
$4.10 discount
Margin of Safety
-60.4%
Fair Value
$594.29
Current Price
$881.51
$287.22 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
No standout strengths identified
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Large-cap with strong market position
Areas to Watch
Trading at 8.3x book value
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Expensive relative to growth rate
ROE of -124.0% — below average capital efficiency
Expensive relative to growth rate
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
1.1% margin — thin
Operating margin of 1.4%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : EDAP
Revenue growth of 13.9% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : MCK
The strongest argument for MCK centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap.
Bear Case : EDAP
The primary concerns for EDAP are Price/Book, Market Cap, PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : MCK
The primary concerns for MCK are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 1.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
EDAP profiles as a turnaround stock while MCK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
MCK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.31 — expect wider price swings.
EDAP is growing revenue faster at 13.9% — sustainability is the question.
EDAP generates stronger free cash flow (-4M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
MCK scores higher overall (43/100 vs 25/100). EDAP offers better value entry with a 41.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
EDAP TMS SA
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION · USA
EDAP TMS SA, develops, produces, markets, distributes and maintains a portfolio of minimally invasive medical devices for the treatment of urological diseases in Asia, France, the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Lyon, France.
McKesson Corporation
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION · USA
McKesson Corporation is an American company distributing pharmaceuticals and providing health information technology, medical supplies, and care management tools.
Visit Website →Compare with Other MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?