WallStSmart

Eastman Chemical Company (EMN)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Eastman Chemical Company generates 91% more annual revenue ($8.75B vs $4.58B). SQM leads profitability with a 12.9% profit margin vs 5.4%. SQM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.46. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

EMN

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.20

SQM

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 9.3Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EMNSignificantly Overvalued (-191.8%)

Margin of Safety

-191.8%

Fair Value

$27.88

Current Price

$71.40

$43.52 premium

UndervaluedFair: $27.88Overvalued
SQMUndervalued (+22.0%)

Margin of Safety

+22.0%

Fair Value

$96.41

Current Price

$79.16

$17.25 discount

UndervaluedFair: $96.41Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EMN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
17.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EPS GrowthGrowth
52.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 52.3% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
28.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

EMN4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
8.0%3/10

ROE of 8.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.4%3/10

5.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.412/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
37.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EMN

The strongest argument for EMN centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : EMN

The primary concerns for EMN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EMN profiles as a value stock while SQM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

EMN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.22 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

EMN generates stronger free cash flow (390M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 46/100) and 23.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Eastman Chemical Company

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Eastman Chemical Company is an American company primarily involved in the chemical industry. Once a subsidiary of Kodak, today it is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. The company is headquartered in Kingsport, Tennessee.

Visit Website →

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?