WallStSmart

Energizer Holdings Inc (ENR)vsVertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co generates 264% more annual revenue ($10.84B vs $2.98B). VRT leads profitability with a 14.4% profit margin vs 6.5%. ENR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.50. VRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

ENR

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 7.0Value: 8.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.25

VRT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.99
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ENRUndervalued (+61.2%)

Margin of Safety

+61.2%

Fair Value

$59.67

Current Price

$19.44

$40.23 discount

UndervaluedFair: $59.67Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for VRT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ENR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
6.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
112.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 113 in profit

VRT4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
30.1%10/10

Revenue surging 30.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
135.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 135.7% YoY

Market CapQuality
$128.48B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

ENR4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.25B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
6.5%3/10

6.5% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.0%2/10

Revenue declined 3.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-62.2%2/10

Earnings declined 62.2%

VRT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.624/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
84.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ENR

The strongest argument for ENR centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Bull Case : VRT

The strongest argument for VRT centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 30.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ENR

The primary concerns for ENR are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 19.66 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : VRT

The primary concerns for VRT are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 84.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ENR profiles as a value stock while VRT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VRT carries more volatility with a beta of 2.10 — expect wider price swings.

VRT is growing revenue faster at 30.1% — sustainability is the question.

VRT generates stronger free cash flow (654M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VRT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 54/100) and 30.1% revenue growth. ENR offers better value entry with a 61.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energizer Holdings Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Energizer Holdings, Inc., manufactures, markets and distributes household batteries, specialty batteries and lighting products worldwide. The company is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.

Visit Website →

Vertiv Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Vertiv Holdings Co designs, manufactures and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and lifecycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?