WallStSmart

Enersys (ENS)vsVertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co generates 189% more annual revenue ($10.84B vs $3.75B). VRT leads profitability with a 14.4% profit margin vs 7.8%. ENS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.21. VRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

ENS

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.17

VRT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.99

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ENS1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

VRT4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
30.1%10/10

Revenue surging 30.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
135.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 135.7% YoY

Market CapQuality
$128.48B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

ENS4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.3%4/10

1.3% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.8%3/10

7.8% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.0%2/10

Earnings declined 15.0%

VRT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.624/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
84.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ENS

The strongest argument for ENS centers on Altman Z-Score. PEG of 1.21 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : VRT

The strongest argument for VRT centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 30.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ENS

The primary concerns for ENS are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : VRT

The primary concerns for VRT are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 84.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ENS profiles as a value stock while VRT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VRT carries more volatility with a beta of 2.10 — expect wider price swings.

VRT is growing revenue faster at 30.1% — sustainability is the question.

VRT generates stronger free cash flow (654M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VRT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 50/100) and 30.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Enersys

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

EnerSys provides various stored energy solutions for industrial applications globally. The company is headquartered in Reading, Pennsylvania.

Vertiv Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Vertiv Holdings Co designs, manufactures and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and lifecycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?