WallStSmart

Enersys (ENS)vsVertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co generates 203% more annual revenue ($11.48B vs $3.79B). VRT leads profitability with a 15.1% profit margin vs 9.3%. VRT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.84. VRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

ENS

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 6.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.17

VRT

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 9.3Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.97

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ENS3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
111.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 111.6% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.958/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

VRT6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 36 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
53.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 53.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$98.97B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.848/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
24.1%8/10

Revenue surging 24.1% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

ENS1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.8%4/10

4.8% revenue growth

VRT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
19.2x4/10

Trading at 19.2x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.974/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
56.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ENS

The strongest argument for ENS centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.95 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : VRT

The strongest argument for VRT centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.1% and operating margin at 20.4%. Revenue growth of 24.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ENS

The primary concerns for ENS are Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : VRT

The primary concerns for VRT are Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 56.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ENS profiles as a value stock while VRT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VRT carries more volatility with a beta of 2.08 — expect wider price swings.

VRT is growing revenue faster at 24.1% — sustainability is the question.

VRT generates stronger free cash flow (925M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VRT scores higher overall (73/100 vs 65/100), backed by strong 15.1% margins and 24.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Enersys

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

EnerSys provides various stored energy solutions for industrial applications globally. The company is headquartered in Reading, Pennsylvania.

Vertiv Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Vertiv Holdings Co designs, manufactures and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and lifecycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?