WallStSmart

Enersys (ENS)vsVertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co generates 174% more annual revenue ($10.23B vs $3.74B). VRT leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 8.4%. ENS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.89. VRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

ENS

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.13

VRT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.25
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ENSSignificantly Overvalued (-222.7%)

Margin of Safety

-222.7%

Fair Value

$54.81

Current Price

$177.42

$122.61 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.81Overvalued
VRTSignificantly Overvalued (-55.7%)

Margin of Safety

-55.7%

Fair Value

$159.59

Current Price

$276.16

$116.57 premium

UndervaluedFair: $159.59Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ENS2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.898/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

VRT4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
41.8%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 42 in profit

Market CapQuality
$103.64B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
21.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
22.7%8/10

Revenue surging 22.7% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

ENS2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.4%4/10

1.4% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
-16.7%2/10

Earnings declined 16.7%

VRT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.834/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
2.0%4/10

2.0% earnings growth

P/E RatioValuation
79.4x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
26.8x2/10

Trading at 26.8x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ENS

The strongest argument for ENS centers on Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.89 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : VRT

The strongest argument for VRT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 22.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ENS

The primary concerns for ENS are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : VRT

The primary concerns for VRT are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 79.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ENS profiles as a value stock while VRT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VRT carries more volatility with a beta of 2.08 — expect wider price swings.

VRT is growing revenue faster at 22.7% — sustainability is the question.

VRT generates stronger free cash flow (912M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VRT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 55/100) and 22.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Enersys

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

EnerSys provides various stored energy solutions for industrial applications globally. The company is headquartered in Reading, Pennsylvania.

Vertiv Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Vertiv Holdings Co designs, manufactures and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and lifecycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?