WallStSmart

Ero Copper Corp (ERO)vsTronox Holdings PLC (TROX)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Tronox Holdings PLC generates 193% more annual revenue ($3.06B vs $1.04B). ERO leads profitability with a 29.8% profit margin vs -19.2%. ERO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

ERO

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 9.3Profit: 9.5Value: 6.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.16

TROX

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.77
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EROOvervalued (-5.1%)

Margin of Safety

-5.1%

Fair Value

$29.96

Current Price

$32.19

$2.23 premium

UndervaluedFair: $29.96Overvalued
TROXUndervalued (+75.5%)

Margin of Safety

+75.5%

Fair Value

$34.32

Current Price

$3.73

$30.59 discount

UndervaluedFair: $34.32Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ERO6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
32.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
37.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 37.6%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
73.9%10/10

Revenue surging 73.9% year-over-year

Profit MarginProfitability
29.8%9/10

Keeps 30 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TROX3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Price/BookValuation
0.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.7%8/10

18.7% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
48.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 48.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

ERO0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

TROX4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$552.56M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-47.3%2/10

ROE of -47.3% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.772/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ERO

The strongest argument for ERO centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.8% and operating margin at 37.6%. Revenue growth of 73.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TROX

The strongest argument for TROX centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 18.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ERO

No major red flags identified for ERO, but monitor valuation.

Bear Case : TROX

The primary concerns for TROX are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.90 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ERO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.63 — expect wider price swings.

ERO is growing revenue faster at 73.9% — sustainability is the question.

TROX generates stronger free cash flow (60M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor COPPER industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ERO scores higher overall (73/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 29.8% margins and 73.9% revenue growth. TROX offers better value entry with a 75.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ero Copper Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · COPPER · USA

Ero Copper Corp. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Tronox Holdings PLC

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Tronox Holdings plc is a vertically integrated manufacturer of TiO2 pigment in North America, South and Central America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?