WallStSmart

ESCO Technologies Inc (ESE)vsFortive Corp (FTV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fortive Corp generates 239% more annual revenue ($4.24B vs $1.25B). ESE leads profitability with a 24.7% profit margin vs 12.8%. FTV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.29. ESE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

ESE

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 3.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.64

FTV

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.00

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ESE3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
33.5%10/10

Revenue surging 33.5% year-over-year

Profit MarginProfitability
24.7%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.139/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

FTV0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

ESE4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.674/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
61.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-811,0002/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

FTV2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
35.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-12.4%2/10

Earnings declined 12.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ESE

The strongest argument for ESE centers on Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.7% and operating margin at 15.5%. Revenue growth of 33.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : FTV

PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ESE

The primary concerns for ESE are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 61.8x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : FTV

The primary concerns for FTV are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ESE profiles as a growth stock while FTV is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ESE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.13 — expect wider price swings.

ESE is growing revenue faster at 33.5% — sustainability is the question.

FTV generates stronger free cash flow (208M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ESE scores higher overall (61/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 24.7% margins and 33.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ESCO Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

ESCO Technologies Inc. produces and supplies products and systems designed for the industrial and commercial markets worldwide. The company is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.

Visit Website →

Fortive Corp

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

Fortive is an American diversified industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?