WallStSmart

ESCO Technologies Inc (ESE)vsFortive Corp (FTV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fortive Corp generates 262% more annual revenue ($4.24B vs $1.17B). ESE leads profitability with a 26.0% profit margin vs 12.8%. FTV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.29. ESE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

ESE

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.64

FTV

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.00
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for ESE.

FTVUndervalued (+8.7%)

Margin of Safety

+8.7%

Fair Value

$64.32

Current Price

$60.43

$3.89 discount

UndervaluedFair: $64.32Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ESE4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.0%10/10

Revenue surging 35.0% year-over-year

Profit MarginProfitability
26.0%9/10

Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.129/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

EPS GrowthGrowth
21.9%8/10

Earnings expanding 21.9% YoY

FTV0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

ESE3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.674/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
68.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

FTV3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
35.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
6.8%3/10

ROE of 6.8% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-12.4%2/10

Earnings declined 12.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ESE

The strongest argument for ESE centers on Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 26.0% and operating margin at 13.3%. Revenue growth of 35.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : FTV

PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ESE

The primary concerns for ESE are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.9x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : FTV

The primary concerns for FTV are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ESE profiles as a growth stock while FTV is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ESE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

ESE is growing revenue faster at 35.0% — sustainability is the question.

FTV generates stronger free cash flow (208M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ESE scores higher overall (61/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 26.0% margins and 35.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ESCO Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

ESCO Technologies Inc. produces and supplies products and systems designed for the industrial and commercial markets worldwide. The company is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.

Visit Website →

Fortive Corp

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

Fortive is an American diversified industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?