WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsGenesis Energy LP (GEL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 5146% more annual revenue ($85.54B vs $1.63B). ET leads profitability with a 5.2% profit margin vs -27.0%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.64. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

ET

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

GEL

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETSignificantly Overvalued (-121.3%)

Margin of Safety

-121.3%

Fair Value

$8.23

Current Price

$19.14

$10.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.23Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GEL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.2/10
Market CapQuality
$66.09B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
29.6%8/10

Revenue surging 29.6% year-over-year

GEL2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
58.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 58.6% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Areas to Watch

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.2%2/10

Earnings declined 15.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

GEL3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
2.7%3/10

ROE of 2.7% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
3.052/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
-27.0%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 29.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : GEL

The strongest argument for GEL centers on EPS Growth, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 10.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : GEL

The primary concerns for GEL are Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a growth stock while GEL is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

GEL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.74 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 29.6% — sustainability is the question.

GEL generates stronger free cash flow (92M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (63/100 vs 52/100) and 29.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Genesis Energy LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Genesis Energy, LP operates in the midstream segment of the crude oil and natural gas industry. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?