WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 14% more annual revenue ($85.54B vs $75.05B). LMT leads profitability with a 6.7% profit margin vs 5.2%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.64. LMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

ET

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

LMT

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 10.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETSignificantly Overvalued (-121.3%)

Margin of Safety

-121.3%

Fair Value

$8.23

Current Price

$19.14

$10.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.23Overvalued
LMTUndervalued (+37.5%)

Margin of Safety

+37.5%

Fair Value

$1005.26

Current Price

$624.20

$381.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1005.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.2/10
Market CapQuality
$66.09B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
29.6%8/10

Revenue surging 29.6% year-over-year

LMT3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
76.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 77 in profit

Market CapQuality
$144.44B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.76B8/10

Generating 2.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.2%2/10

Earnings declined 15.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.6%4/10

1.6% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 29.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. PEG of 1.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 3.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a growth stock while LMT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ET carries more volatility with a beta of 0.65 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 29.6% — sustainability is the question.

LMT generates stronger free cash flow (2.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (65/100 vs 63/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?