WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsONEOK Inc (OKE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 162% more annual revenue ($92.29B vs $35.20B). OKE leads profitability with a 10.0% profit margin vs 4.7%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. OKE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

ET

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.7Quality: 5.0

OKE

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.19
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETUndervalued (+87.7%)

Margin of Safety

+87.7%

Fair Value

$148.16

Current Price

$19.34

$128.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $148.16Overvalued
OKESignificantly Overvalued (-18.0%)

Margin of Safety

-18.0%

Fair Value

$71.97

Current Price

$85.16

$13.19 premium

UndervaluedFair: $71.97Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET6 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
32.1%10/10

Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$68.55B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
16.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.38B8/10

Generating 3.4B in free cash flow

OKE4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$54.10B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
19.6%8/10

19.6% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

ET2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

4.7% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.6%2/10

Earnings declined 3.6%

OKE4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.074/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Debt/EquityHealth
1.533/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.192/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : OKE

The strongest argument for OKE centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 19.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : OKE

The primary concerns for OKE are PEG Ratio, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 1.53 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while OKE is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

OKE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.76 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 32.1% — sustainability is the question.

ET generates stronger free cash flow (3.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OKE scores higher overall (65/100 vs 62/100) and 19.6% revenue growth. ET offers better value entry with a 87.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

ONEOK Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Oneok, Inc. is a diversified Fortune 500 energy corporation based in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?