WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsConstellation Brands Inc Class A (STZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 910% more annual revenue ($92.29B vs $9.14B). STZ leads profitability with a 18.5% profit margin vs 4.7%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

ET

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.7Quality: 5.0

STZ

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.95
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETUndervalued (+87.8%)

Margin of Safety

+87.8%

Fair Value

$148.63

Current Price

$19.34

$129.29 discount

UndervaluedFair: $148.63Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for STZ.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
32.1%10/10

Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$68.55B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
16.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

STZ3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
22.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
26.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.7%

Areas to Watch

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

4.7% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.6%2/10

Earnings declined 3.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

STZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.954/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.383/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
2.742/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.3%2/10

Revenue declined 11.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : STZ

The strongest argument for STZ centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.5% and operating margin at 26.7%.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : STZ

The primary concerns for STZ are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while STZ is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

ET carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 32.1% — sustainability is the question.

STZ generates stronger free cash flow (344M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (62/100 vs 56/100) and 32.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Constellation Brands Inc Class A

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Constellation Brands, Inc., headquartered in Victor, New York, is an American producer and marketer of beer, wine, and spirits.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?