WallStSmart

Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsThermo Fisher Scientific Inc (TMO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy Transfer LP generates 92% more annual revenue ($85.54B vs $44.56B). TMO leads profitability with a 15.0% profit margin vs 5.2%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.64. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

ET

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

TMO

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ETSignificantly Overvalued (-121.3%)

Margin of Safety

-121.3%

Fair Value

$8.23

Current Price

$19.14

$10.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.23Overvalued
TMOSignificantly Overvalued (-27.5%)

Margin of Safety

-27.5%

Fair Value

$384.82

Current Price

$490.77

$105.95 premium

UndervaluedFair: $384.82Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.2/10
Market CapQuality
$66.09B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
29.6%8/10

Revenue surging 29.6% year-over-year

TMO3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$182.14B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
21.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.99B8/10

Generating 3.0B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.2%2/10

Earnings declined 15.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

TMO3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.764/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
27.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 29.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TMO

The strongest argument for TMO centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : TMO

The primary concerns for TMO are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ET profiles as a growth stock while TMO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

TMO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 29.6% — sustainability is the question.

TMO generates stronger free cash flow (3.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (63/100 vs 59/100) and 29.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Thermo Fisher Scientific is an American provisioner of scientific instrumentation, reagents and consumables, and software and services to healthcare, life science, and other laboratories in academia, government, and industry (including in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors). Based in Waltham, Massachusetts, Thermo Fisher was created in 2006 by the merger of Thermo Electron and Fisher Scientific, to form a company with US$ 9 billion in combined revenues.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?