WallStSmart

Entravision Communications (EVC)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 2927% more annual revenue ($13.55B vs $447.59M). WPP leads profitability with a -1.6% profit margin vs -17.7%. WPP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.23. EVC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 37/100 (F).

EVC

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0

WPP

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EVC1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.6%8/10

Revenue surging 25.6% year-over-year

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

EVC4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$275.89M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

Operating margin of 4.2%

PEG RatioValuation
6.432/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-77.8%2/10

ROE of -77.8% — below average capital efficiency

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EVC

The strongest argument for EVC centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 25.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : EVC

The primary concerns for EVC are Market Cap, Operating Margin, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EVC profiles as a growth stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

EVC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

EVC is growing revenue faster at 25.6% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

EVC scores higher overall (37/100 vs 35/100) and 25.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Entravision Communications

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Entravision Communications Corporation is a global media, marketing and technology company. The company is headquartered in Santa Monica, California.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?