WallStSmart

Edwards Lifesciences Corp (EW)vsHaemonetics Corporation (HAE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Edwards Lifesciences Corp generates 388% more annual revenue ($6.51B vs $1.33B). EW leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs 7.3%. HAE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.35. HAE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

EW

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 8.0Value: 5.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.48

HAE

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.51
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EWUndervalued (+69.3%)

Margin of Safety

+69.3%

Fair Value

$257.97

Current Price

$89.60

$168.37 discount

UndervaluedFair: $257.97Overvalued
HAEUndervalued (+33.5%)

Margin of Safety

+33.5%

Fair Value

$86.50

Current Price

$85.38

$1.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $86.50Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EW2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.4810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
29.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.8%

HAE1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
28.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 28.4% YoY

Areas to Watch

EW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.094/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
51.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-25.4%2/10

Earnings declined 25.4%

HAE4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.8%4/10

4.8% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.514/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
7.3%3/10

7.3% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.543/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EW

The strongest argument for EW centers on Altman Z-Score, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 29.8%. Revenue growth of 13.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : HAE

The strongest argument for HAE centers on EPS Growth. PEG of 1.35 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : EW

The primary concerns for EW are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 51.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : HAE

The primary concerns for HAE are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. A P/E of 41.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.54 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EW profiles as a mature stock while HAE is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

EW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.85 — expect wider price swings.

EW is growing revenue faster at 13.6% — sustainability is the question.

HAE generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

HAE scores higher overall (56/100 vs 55/100). EW offers better value entry with a 69.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Edwards Lifesciences Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Edwards Lifesciences is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring.

Visit Website →

Haemonetics Corporation

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Haemonetics Corporation, a healthcare company, offers medical products and solutions. The company is headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?