WallStSmart

Edwards Lifesciences Corp (EW)vsInfuSystems Holdings Inc (INFU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Edwards Lifesciences Corp generates 4326% more annual revenue ($6.30B vs $142.40M). EW leads profitability with a 17.4% profit margin vs 5.5%. INFU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.73. EW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

EW

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.0Value: 6.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.48

INFU

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.96
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EWUndervalued (+68.7%)

Margin of Safety

+68.7%

Fair Value

$253.29

Current Price

$85.96

$167.33 discount

UndervaluedFair: $253.29Overvalued
INFUUndervalued (+26.5%)

Margin of Safety

+26.5%

Fair Value

$10.36

Current Price

$9.03

$1.33 discount

UndervaluedFair: $10.36Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EW4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
31.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.2%

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.4810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.7%8/10

16.7% revenue growth

INFU1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
123.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 123.9% YoY

Areas to Watch

EW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.054/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
46.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-21.10M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

INFU4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.734/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.964/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$186.48M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
5.5%3/10

5.5% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EW

The strongest argument for EW centers on Operating Margin, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.4% and operating margin at 31.2%. Revenue growth of 16.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : INFU

The strongest argument for INFU centers on EPS Growth.

Bear Case : EW

The primary concerns for EW are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 46.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : INFU

The primary concerns for INFU are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EW profiles as a growth stock while INFU is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

INFU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.42 — expect wider price swings.

EW is growing revenue faster at 16.7% — sustainability is the question.

INFU generates stronger free cash flow (-867,000), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

EW scores higher overall (61/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 17.4% margins and 16.7% revenue growth. INFU offers better value entry with a 26.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Edwards Lifesciences Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Edwards Lifesciences is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring.

Visit Website →

InfuSystems Holdings Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

InfuSystem Holdings, Inc., provides infusion pumps and related products and services in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Rochester Hills, Michigan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?