Edwards Lifesciences Corp (EW)vsPenske Automotive Group Inc (PAG)
EW
Edwards Lifesciences Corp
$79.96
-3.38%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $47.71B
PAG
Penske Automotive Group Inc
$173.81
+1.28%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $11.16B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Penske Automotive Group Inc generates 403% more annual revenue ($31.72B vs $6.30B). EW leads profitability with a 17.4% profit margin vs 2.9%. EW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.04. EW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).
EW
Buy61
out of 100
Grade: C+
PAG
Buy51
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+69.7%
Fair Value
$261.90
Current Price
$79.96
$181.94 discount
Margin of Safety
-1.7%
Fair Value
$170.26
Current Price
$173.81
$3.55 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Strong operational efficiency at 31.2%
16.7% revenue growth
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Weak financial health signals
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Expensive relative to growth rate
2.9% margin — thin
Operating margin of 3.7%
Elevated debt levels
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : EW
The strongest argument for EW centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.4% and operating margin at 31.2%. Revenue growth of 16.7% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : PAG
The strongest argument for PAG centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.
Bear Case : EW
The primary concerns for EW are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 44.7x leaves little room for execution misses.
Bear Case : PAG
The primary concerns for PAG are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.56 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
EW profiles as a growth stock while PAG is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
PAG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.89 — expect wider price swings.
EW is growing revenue faster at 16.7% — sustainability is the question.
PAG generates stronger free cash flow (152M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
EW scores higher overall (61/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 17.4% margins and 16.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Edwards Lifesciences Corp
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA
Edwards Lifesciences is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring.
Visit Website →Penske Automotive Group Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA
Penske Automotive Group, Inc., a diversified transportation services company, operates commercial and automotive truck dealerships. The company is headquartered in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.
Visit Website →Compare with Other MEDICAL DEVICES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?