WallStSmart

EXACT Sciences Corporation (EXAS)vsNatera Inc (NTRA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

EXACT Sciences Corporation generates 30% more annual revenue ($3.25B vs $2.50B). EXAS leads profitability with a -6.4% profit margin vs -9.1%. EXAS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 32/100 (F).

EXAS

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.01

NTRA

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 3/9

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EXAS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.1%8/10

Revenue surging 23.1% year-over-year

NTRA2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
38.8%10/10

Revenue surging 38.8% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.149/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

EXAS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
-8.7%2/10

ROE of -8.7% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.012/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

NTRA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
17.3x4/10

Trading at 17.3x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.8%2/10

ROE of -12.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EXAS

The strongest argument for EXAS centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : NTRA

The strongest argument for NTRA centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 38.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : EXAS

The primary concerns for EXAS are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : NTRA

The primary concerns for NTRA are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EXAS profiles as a growth stock while NTRA is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

NTRA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.54 — expect wider price swings.

NTRA is growing revenue faster at 38.8% — sustainability is the question.

EXAS generates stronger free cash flow (120M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

EXAS scores higher overall (32/100 vs 31/100) and 23.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Avoid" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

EXACT Sciences Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Exact Sciences Corporation offers cancer screening and diagnostic test products in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin.

Natera Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Natera, Inc., a diagnostic company, develops and markets molecular testing services globally. The company is headquartered in San Carlos, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?