WallStSmart

Ford Motor Company (F)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 73% more annual revenue ($323.90B vs $187.27B). XOM leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs -4.4%. XOM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.02. F earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

F

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.91

XOM

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for F.

XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-262.4%)

Margin of Safety

-262.4%

Fair Value

$45.63

Current Price

$163.26

$117.63 premium

UndervaluedFair: $45.63Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

F2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.10B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

XOM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$665.31B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.23B8/10

Generating 5.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

F4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
1.7%4/10

1.7% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
8.712/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-20.2%2/10

ROE of -20.2% — below average capital efficiency

XOM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.024/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.3%2/10

Revenue declined 1.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : F

The strongest argument for F centers on Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : F

The primary concerns for F are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 4.66 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

F profiles as a turnaround stock while XOM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

F carries more volatility with a beta of 1.67 — expect wider price swings.

XOM is growing revenue faster at -1.3% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (5.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

F scores higher overall (47/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ford Motor Company

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · USA

Ford Motor Company, commonly known as Ford, is an American multinational automaker that has its main headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan.

Visit Website →

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?