WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsGranite Construction Incorporated (GVA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial SE generates 98% more annual revenue ($9.86B vs $4.97B). FER leads profitability with a 6.2% profit margin vs -3.3%. GVA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.12. GVA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.94

GVA

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.00
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.

GVASignificantly Overvalued (-82.3%)

Margin of Safety

-82.3%

Fair Value

$73.06

Current Price

$118.92

$45.86 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.06Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

GVA3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1210/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Revenue GrowthGrowth
29.3%8/10

Revenue surging 29.3% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
25.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 25.1% YoY

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.863/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
8.642/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
58.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

GVA3 concerns · Avg: 1.7/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Profit MarginProfitability
-3.3%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Debt/EquityHealth
2.301/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

FER has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : GVA

The strongest argument for GVA centers on PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 29.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.12 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 58.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : GVA

The primary concerns for GVA are Piotroski F-Score, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.30 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while GVA is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

GVA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.33 — expect wider price swings.

GVA is growing revenue faster at 29.3% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (733M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GVA scores higher overall (53/100 vs 38/100) and 29.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Granite Construction Incorporated

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Granite Construction Incorporated is an infrastructure contractor and producer of building materials in the United States. The company is headquartered in Watsonville, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?