WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsMasTec Inc (MTZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

MasTec Inc generates 59% more annual revenue ($15.28B vs $9.63B). FER leads profitability with a 9.2% profit margin vs 3.0%. MTZ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.64. MTZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.94

MTZ

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 5.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.43

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

MTZ2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
34.5%10/10

Revenue surging 34.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
508.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 508.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.192/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
49.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.942/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

MTZ4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.644/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.6x4/10

Trading at 8.6x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
3.0%3/10

3.0% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

Operating margin of 3.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : MTZ

The strongest argument for MTZ centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 34.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 49.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : MTZ

The primary concerns for MTZ are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. A P/E of 63.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while MTZ is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MTZ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.79 — expect wider price swings.

MTZ is growing revenue faster at 34.5% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MTZ scores higher overall (63/100 vs 38/100) and 34.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

MasTec Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

MasTec, Inc., an infrastructure construction company, provides engineering, construction, installation, maintenance, and upgrade services for communications, energy, utilities, and other infrastructure primarily in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?