WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsOshkosh Corporation (OSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 8% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $9.86B). FER leads profitability with a 6.2% profit margin vs 5.2%. OSK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 6.51. OSK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.94

OSK

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.82

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

OSK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.249/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.863/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
8.642/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
58.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-7.6%2/10

Earnings declined 7.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

FER has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 58.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

OSK is growing revenue faster at 6.7% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (733M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

OSK scores higher overall (50/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?