WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsOshkosh Corporation (OSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 8% more annual revenue ($10.42B vs $9.63B). FER leads profitability with a 9.2% profit margin vs 6.2%. FER appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 5.49. OSK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0

OSK

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.

OSKUndervalued (+32.8%)

Margin of Safety

+32.8%

Fair Value

$259.60

Current Price

$147.37

$112.23 discount

UndervaluedFair: $259.60Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

OSK2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
14.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.492/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
47.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 47.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.39 — expect wider price swings.

FER is growing revenue faster at 5.7% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

OSK scores higher overall (48/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?