WallStSmart

FutureFuel Corp (FF)vsMP Materials Corp (MP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

MP Materials Corp generates 172% more annual revenue ($416.25M vs $153.21M). MP leads profitability with a -14.6% profit margin vs -17.2%. FF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 41/100 (D).

FF

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 3.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.29

MP

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.51
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FFUndervalued (+23.0%)

Margin of Safety

+23.0%

Fair Value

$4.87

Current Price

$5.47

$0.60 discount

UndervaluedFair: $4.87Overvalued
MPSignificantly Overvalued (-22.9%)

Margin of Safety

-22.9%

Fair Value

$44.19

Current Price

$50.72

$6.53 premium

UndervaluedFair: $44.19Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FF2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
120.7%10/10

Revenue surging 120.7% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
119.7%10/10

Revenue surging 119.7% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FF4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$239.49M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-31.4%2/10

ROE of -31.4% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-88.7%2/10

Earnings declined 88.7%

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.514/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-223.49M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FF

The strongest argument for FF centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 120.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 119.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FF

The primary concerns for FF are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.95 — expect wider price swings.

FF is growing revenue faster at 120.7% — sustainability is the question.

FF generates stronger free cash flow (11M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SPECIALTY CHEMICALS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FF scores higher overall (41/100 vs 30/100) and 120.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

FutureFuel Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

FutureFuel Corp. The company is headquartered in Saint Louis, Missouri.

Visit Website →

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?