WallStSmart

FutureFuel Corp (FF)vsMP Materials Corp (MP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

MP Materials Corp generates 216% more annual revenue ($347.57M vs $110.16M). MP leads profitability with a -20.5% profit margin vs -47.1%. FF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 37/100 (F).

FF

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.20

MP

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FFOvervalued (-7.5%)

Margin of Safety

-7.5%

Fair Value

$3.49

Current Price

$4.30

$0.81 premium

UndervaluedFair: $3.49Overvalued
MPSignificantly Overvalued (-55.4%)

Margin of Safety

-55.4%

Fair Value

$37.03

Current Price

$65.45

$28.42 premium

UndervaluedFair: $37.03Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FF2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
82.2%10/10

Revenue surging 82.2% year-over-year

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
118.6%10/10

Revenue surging 118.6% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FF4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$190.81M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-31.4%2/10

ROE of -31.4% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-88.7%2/10

Earnings declined 88.7%

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-79.28M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FF

The strongest argument for FF centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 82.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 118.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FF

The primary concerns for FF are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.84 — expect wider price swings.

MP is growing revenue faster at 118.6% — sustainability is the question.

FF generates stronger free cash flow (-25M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SPECIALTY CHEMICALS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FF scores higher overall (37/100 vs 28/100) and 82.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

FutureFuel Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

FutureFuel Corp. The company is headquartered in Saint Louis, Missouri.

Visit Website →

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?