WallStSmart

FutureFuel Corp (FF)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B generates 4711% more annual revenue ($5.30B vs $110.16M). SQM leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs -47.1%. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

FF

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.20

SQM

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FFOvervalued (-7.5%)

Margin of Safety

-7.5%

Fair Value

$3.49

Current Price

$4.30

$0.81 premium

UndervaluedFair: $3.49Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SQM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FF2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
82.2%10/10

Revenue surging 82.2% year-over-year

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
41.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.8%10/10

Revenue surging 69.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
165.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 165.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

FF4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$190.81M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-31.4%2/10

ROE of -31.4% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-88.7%2/10

Earnings declined 88.7%

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FF

The strongest argument for FF centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 82.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 41.1%. Revenue growth of 69.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FF

The primary concerns for FF are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FF profiles as a hypergrowth stock while SQM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FF carries more volatility with a beta of 0.98 — expect wider price swings.

FF is growing revenue faster at 82.2% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (679M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (74/100 vs 37/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins and 69.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

FutureFuel Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

FutureFuel Corp. The company is headquartered in Saint Louis, Missouri.

Visit Website →

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?