WallStSmart

Full House Resorts Inc (FLL)vsLas Vegas Sands Corp (LVS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Las Vegas Sands Corp generates 4385% more annual revenue ($13.72B vs $305.86M). LVS leads profitability with a 12.6% profit margin vs -12.1%. FLL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.66. LVS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

FLL

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 7.3Profit: 3.0Value: 6.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.19

LVS

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 8.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.41
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FLL.

LVSUndervalued (+38.7%)

Margin of Safety

+38.7%

Fair Value

$94.18

Current Price

$42.83

$51.35 discount

UndervaluedFair: $94.18Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLL2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-39.5010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.668/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

LVS3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Return on EquityProfitability
301.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 302 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.958/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
17.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

FLL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$75.85M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

Operating margin of 2.9%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-300.8%2/10

ROE of -300.8% — below average capital efficiency

LVS4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Price/BookValuation
47.6x2/10

Trading at 47.6x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.7%2/10

Revenue declined 0.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-19.8%2/10

Earnings declined 19.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.412/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLL

The strongest argument for FLL centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.66 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LVS

The strongest argument for LVS centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. PEG of 0.95 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FLL

The primary concerns for FLL are Market Cap, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : LVS

The primary concerns for LVS are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 26.27 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLL profiles as a turnaround stock while LVS is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

FLL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

FLL is growing revenue faster at 5.6% — sustainability is the question.

LVS generates stronger free cash flow (360M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LVS scores higher overall (53/100 vs 41/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Full House Resorts Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESORTS & CASINOS · USA

Full House Resorts, Inc. owns, develops, invests, operates, manages and leases casinos and related hospitality and entertainment facilities in the United States. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Las Vegas Sands Corp

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESORTS & CASINOS · USA

Las Vegas Sands Corporation is an American casino and resort company based in Paradise, Nevada, United States. Its resorts feature accommodations, gambling and entertainment, convention and exhibition facilities, restaurants and clubs, as well as an art and science museum in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?