WallStSmart

Flowserve Corporation (FLS)vsParker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 351% more annual revenue ($20.99B vs $4.65B). PH leads profitability with a 16.6% profit margin vs 7.6%. FLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.92. PH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

FLS

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.94

PH

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FLSOvervalued (-6.0%)

Margin of Safety

-6.0%

Fair Value

$81.64

Current Price

$73.50

$8.14 premium

UndervaluedFair: $81.64Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PH.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLS0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$105.45B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.5%

Areas to Watch

FLS4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.924/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
28.7x4/10

Moderate valuation

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.7%2/10

Revenue declined 6.7%

PH3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

PEG RatioValuation
3.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-4.2%2/10

Earnings declined 4.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLS

FLS has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.6% and operating margin at 21.5%. Revenue growth of 10.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FLS

The primary concerns for FLS are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLS profiles as a value stock while PH is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

FLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

PH is growing revenue faster at 10.6% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (881M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PH scores higher overall (55/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 16.6% margins and 10.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Flowserve Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Flowserve Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, distributes and services industrial flow management equipment in the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and Europe. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?