WallStSmart

Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT)vsHigh Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Flutter Entertainment plc generates 109681% more annual revenue ($17.16B vs $15.63M). ROLR leads profitability with a 10.8% profit margin vs -4.4%. FLUT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

FLUT

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.29

ROLR

Avoid

25

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 3.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.56
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FLUTSignificantly Overvalued (-27.2%)

Margin of Safety

-27.2%

Fair Value

$113.45

Current Price

$100.56

$12.89 premium

UndervaluedFair: $113.45Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for ROLR.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLUT2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1910/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

ROLR2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FLUT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.443/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-9.1%2/10

ROE of -9.1% — below average capital efficiency

ROLR4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$70.59M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
3.2%3/10

ROE of 3.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLUT

The strongest argument for FLUT centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.19 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : ROLR

The strongest argument for ROLR centers on Debt/Equity, Price/Book.

Bear Case : FLUT

The primary concerns for FLUT are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : ROLR

The primary concerns for ROLR are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. A P/E of 42.7x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLUT profiles as a turnaround stock while ROLR is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

FLUT is growing revenue faster at 3.3% — sustainability is the question.

FLUT generates stronger free cash flow (189M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor GAMBLING industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FLUT scores higher overall (46/100 vs 25/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Flutter Entertainment plc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · GAMBLING · USA

Flutter Entertainment plc is a sports betting and gaming company in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, the United States, Italy, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Dublin, Ireland.

Visit Website →

High Roller Technologies, Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · GAMBLING · USA

High Roller Technologies, Inc., engages in the online gaming business globally. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?