WallStSmart

Flux Power Holdings Inc (FLUX)vsVertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co generates 16732% more annual revenue ($10.23B vs $60.77M). VRT leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs -8.4%. VRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

FLUX

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 3.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -3.12

VRT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.25
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FLUX.

VRTSignificantly Overvalued (-55.7%)

Margin of Safety

-55.7%

Fair Value

$159.59

Current Price

$276.16

$116.57 premium

UndervaluedFair: $159.59Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLUX0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

VRT4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
41.8%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 42 in profit

Market CapQuality
$103.64B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
21.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
22.7%8/10

Revenue surging 22.7% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FLUX4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$25.82M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.1%2/10

ROE of -2.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-16.1%2/10

Revenue declined 16.1%

VRT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.834/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
2.0%4/10

2.0% earnings growth

P/E RatioValuation
79.4x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
26.8x2/10

Trading at 26.8x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLUX

FLUX has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : VRT

The strongest argument for VRT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 22.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FLUX

The primary concerns for FLUX are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : VRT

The primary concerns for VRT are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 79.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLUX profiles as a turnaround stock while VRT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VRT carries more volatility with a beta of 2.08 — expect wider price swings.

VRT is growing revenue faster at 22.7% — sustainability is the question.

VRT generates stronger free cash flow (912M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VRT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 28/100) and 22.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Flux Power Holdings Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Flux Power Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiary Flux Power, Inc., designs, develops, manufactures and sells rechargeable lithium-ion energy storage systems for electric forklifts, airport ground support equipment and other applications of industrial motifs in the United States. The company is headquartered in Vista, California.

Vertiv Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Vertiv Holdings Co designs, manufactures and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and lifecycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?