WallStSmart

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)vsNational HealthCare Corporation (NHC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 1208% more annual revenue ($19.63B vs $1.50B). NHC leads profitability with a 6.8% profit margin vs 5.0%. FMS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. FMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

FMS

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 10.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.82

NHC

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FMSUndervalued (+73.4%)

Margin of Safety

+73.4%

Fair Value

$90.32

Current Price

$22.26

$68.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $90.32Overvalued
NHCSignificantly Overvalued (-282.1%)

Margin of Safety

-282.1%

Fair Value

$44.06

Current Price

$161.42

$117.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $44.06Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FMS3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.2x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

NHC2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.828/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FMS4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.824/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
7.9%3/10

ROE of 7.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.0%3/10

5.0% margin — thin

NHC3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Market CapQuality
$1.96B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
6.8%3/10

6.8% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-8.4%2/10

Earnings declined 8.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FMS

The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NHC

The strongest argument for NHC centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.82 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FMS

The primary concerns for FMS are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Thin 5.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : NHC

The primary concerns for NHC are Market Cap, Profit Margin, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FMS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.

NHC is growing revenue faster at 12.5% — sustainability is the question.

FMS generates stronger free cash flow (564M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FMS scores higher overall (62/100 vs 54/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.

Visit Website →

National HealthCare Corporation

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

National HealthCare Corporation operates, manages, and provides services to skilled nursing facilities, assisted living facilities, independent living facilities, home health programs, and a behavioral health hospital. The company is headquartered in Murfreesboro, Tennessee.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?