Fresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)vsTC Energy Corp (TRP)
FMS
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
$22.26
+1.04%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $12.47B
TRP
TC Energy Corp
$64.08
+0.02%
ENERGY · Cap: $66.54B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 29% more annual revenue ($19.63B vs $15.24B). TRP leads profitability with a 23.1% profit margin vs 5.0%. FMS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. FMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).
FMS
Buy62
out of 100
Grade: C+
TRP
Buy59
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+73.4%
Fair Value
$90.32
Current Price
$22.26
$68.06 discount
Margin of Safety
-216.8%
Fair Value
$19.23
Current Price
$64.08
$44.85 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Growing faster than its price suggests
Strong operational efficiency at 45.4%
Large-cap with strong market position
Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit
16.5% revenue growth
Areas to Watch
4.2% earnings growth
Grey zone — moderate risk
ROE of 7.9% — below average capital efficiency
5.0% margin — thin
Moderate valuation
0.5% earnings growth
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FMS
The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : TRP
The strongest argument for TRP centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 23.1% and operating margin at 45.4%. Revenue growth of 16.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : FMS
The primary concerns for FMS are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Thin 5.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : TRP
The primary concerns for TRP are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FMS profiles as a value stock while TRP is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
TRP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.00 — expect wider price swings.
TRP is growing revenue faster at 16.5% — sustainability is the question.
FMS generates stronger free cash flow (564M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
FMS scores higher overall (62/100 vs 59/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.
Visit Website →TC Energy Corp
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
TC Energy Corporation is an energy infrastructure company in North America. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Compare with Other MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?