WallStSmart

Fomento Economico Mexicano (FMX)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fomento Economico Mexicano generates 6377% more annual revenue ($840.95B vs $12.98B). WDS leads profitability with a 20.9% profit margin vs 2.3%. WDS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.33. FMX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

FMX

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.46

WDS

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FMXUndervalued (+15.9%)

Margin of Safety

+15.9%

Fair Value

$134.78

Current Price

$108.51

$26.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $134.78Overvalued
WDSSignificantly Overvalued (-94.1%)

Margin of Safety

-94.1%

Fair Value

$9.66

Current Price

$23.66

$14.00 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.66Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FMX2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
63.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 63.8% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$9.49B8/10

Generating 9.5B in free cash flow

WDS3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
20.9%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

FMX4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
36.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
2.3%3/10

2.3% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

WDS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-14.4%2/10

Earnings declined 14.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FMX

The strongest argument for FMX centers on EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : WDS

The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.9% and operating margin at 19.1%. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FMX

The primary concerns for FMX are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 2.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WDS

The primary concerns for WDS are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FMX profiles as a value stock while WDS is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

FMX carries more volatility with a beta of 0.23 — expect wider price swings.

FMX is growing revenue faster at 5.4% — sustainability is the question.

FMX generates stronger free cash flow (9.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FMX scores higher overall (59/100 vs 53/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fomento Economico Mexicano

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Fomento Econmico Mexicano, SAB de CV, is a bottler of Coca-Cola brand beverages. The company is headquartered in Monterrey, Mexico.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?