WallStSmart

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc generates 505% more annual revenue ($4.68B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 4.5%. KEN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

FND

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.82

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNDSignificantly Overvalued (-427.9%)

Margin of Safety

-427.9%

Fair Value

$13.06

Current Price

$52.77

$39.71 premium

UndervaluedFair: $13.06Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FND1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Areas to Watch

FND4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
26.8x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.0%4/10

2.0% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

4.5% margin — thin

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FND

The strongest argument for FND centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bear Case : FND

The primary concerns for FND are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth. Thin 4.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FND profiles as a value stock while KEN is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

FND carries more volatility with a beta of 1.74 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (71M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KEN scores higher overall (44/100 vs 42/100), backed by strong 63.8% margins. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?