WallStSmart

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)vsLindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc (LIND)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc generates 467% more annual revenue ($4.71B vs $830.61M). FND leads profitability with a 4.9% profit margin vs -2.1%. FND earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

FND

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.05

LIND

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 9.3Profit: 4.0Value: 6.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.16
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNDUndervalued (+15.1%)

Margin of Safety

+15.1%

Fair Value

$81.23

Current Price

$47.34

$33.89 discount

UndervaluedFair: $81.23Overvalued
LINDUndervalued (+22.4%)

Margin of Safety

+22.4%

Fair Value

$25.87

Current Price

$25.67

$0.20 discount

UndervaluedFair: $25.87Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FND2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
53.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 53.4% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LIND3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
400.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 400.4% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
-3.4010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.6%8/10

18.6% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

FND3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.0%4/10

3.0% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

4.9% margin — thin

LIND4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.71B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-1947.0%2/10

ROE of -1947.0% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.162/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
-2.1%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FND

The strongest argument for FND centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bull Case : LIND

The strongest argument for LIND centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 18.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FND

The primary concerns for FND are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin. Thin 4.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LIND

The primary concerns for LIND are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FND profiles as a value stock while LIND is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

LIND carries more volatility with a beta of 2.22 — expect wider price swings.

LIND is growing revenue faster at 18.6% — sustainability is the question.

FND generates stronger free cash flow (96M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FND scores higher overall (53/100 vs 39/100). LIND offers better value entry with a 22.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · TRAVEL SERVICES · USA

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. offers adventure travel experiences and expedition cruises. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?