WallStSmart

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)vsRectitude Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares (RECT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc generates 10026% more annual revenue ($4.68B vs $46.17M). RECT leads profitability with a 8.1% profit margin vs 4.3%. RECT trades at a lower P/E of 5.8x. RECT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

FND

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.05

RECT

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.5Value: 6.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.84
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNDUndervalued (+15.3%)

Margin of Safety

+15.3%

Fair Value

$81.36

Current Price

$47.41

$33.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $81.36Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for RECT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FND1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

RECT4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
5.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
125.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 125.0% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
23.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit

Areas to Watch

FND4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Profit MarginProfitability
4.3%3/10

4.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

RECT3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Market CapQuality
$16.82M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.42M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FND

The strongest argument for FND centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : RECT

The strongest argument for RECT centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FND

The primary concerns for FND are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Profit Margin. Thin 4.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : RECT

The primary concerns for RECT are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

RECT is growing revenue faster at 10.8% — sustainability is the question.

FND generates stronger free cash flow (46M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

RECT scores higher overall (58/100 vs 40/100) and 10.8% revenue growth. FND offers better value entry with a 15.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Rectitude Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · SPECIALTY RETAIL · USA

Rectitude Holdings Ltd, an investment holding company, engages in the wholesale and supply of safety equipment primarily in Singapore. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?