WallStSmart

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 6815% more annual revenue ($323.90B vs $4.68B). XOM leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs 4.5%. XOM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.02. XOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

FND

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.82

XOM

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNDSignificantly Overvalued (-427.9%)

Margin of Safety

-427.9%

Fair Value

$13.06

Current Price

$52.77

$39.71 premium

UndervaluedFair: $13.06Overvalued
XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-262.4%)

Margin of Safety

-262.4%

Fair Value

$45.63

Current Price

$163.26

$117.63 premium

UndervaluedFair: $45.63Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FND1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

XOM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$665.31B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.23B8/10

Generating 5.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

FND4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
26.8x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.0%4/10

2.0% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

4.5% margin — thin

XOM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.024/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.3%2/10

Revenue declined 1.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FND

The strongest argument for FND centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : FND

The primary concerns for FND are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth. Thin 4.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FND carries more volatility with a beta of 1.74 — expect wider price swings.

FND is growing revenue faster at 2.0% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (5.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

XOM scores higher overall (44/100 vs 42/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?