WallStSmart

Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV)vsQuanta Services Inc (PWR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Quanta Services Inc generates 1343% more annual revenue ($30.12B vs $2.09B). FNV leads profitability with a 65.7% profit margin vs 3.7%. PWR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.00. FNV earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

FNV

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 9.3Profit: 9.0Value: 3.3Quality: 7.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 8.71

PWR

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.0Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 2.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNVSignificantly Overvalued (-36.5%)

Margin of Safety

-36.5%

Fair Value

$188.83

Current Price

$218.74

$29.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $188.83Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PWR.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FNV5 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
65.7%10/10

Keeps 66 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
79.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 79.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
77.7%10/10

Revenue surging 77.7% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
123.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 123.1% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
8.7110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PWR3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
51.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 51.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$108.70B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.3%8/10

Revenue surging 26.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FNV2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.5x4/10

Moderate valuation

PEG RatioValuation
11.812/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

PWR4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.004/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
11.9x4/10

Trading at 11.9x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

Operating margin of 4.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FNV

The strongest argument for FNV centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 65.7% and operating margin at 79.3%. Revenue growth of 77.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PWR

The strongest argument for PWR centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 26.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FNV

The primary concerns for FNV are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : PWR

The primary concerns for PWR are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. A P/E of 99.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PWR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.22 — expect wider price swings.

FNV is growing revenue faster at 77.7% — sustainability is the question.

PWR generates stronger free cash flow (172M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor GOLD industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FNV scores higher overall (71/100 vs 56/100), backed by strong 65.7% margins and 77.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Franco-Nevada Corporation

BASIC MATERIALS · GOLD · USA

Franco-Nevada Corporation is a gold-focused royalty and flow company in the United States, Latin America, Canada, Australia, Europe and Africa, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Visit Website →

Quanta Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Quanta Services is an American corporation that provides infrastructure services for electric power, pipeline, industrial and communications industries. Capabilities include the planning, design, installation, program management, maintenance and repair of most types of network infrastructure.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?