Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (FRD)vsArcelorMittal SA ADR (MT)
FRD
Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock
$40.48
-1.89%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $302.79M
MT
ArcelorMittal SA ADR
$63.05
-0.86%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $47.37B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
ArcelorMittal SA ADR generates 8256% more annual revenue ($62.85B vs $752.11M). FRD leads profitability with a 3.6% profit margin vs 2.9%. FRD trades at a lower P/E of 10.9x. FRD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).
FRD
Buy63
out of 100
Grade: C+
MT
Buy52
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+40.5%
Fair Value
$35.33
Current Price
$40.48
$5.15 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for MT.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Revenue surging 78.1% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 152.1% YoY
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Reasonable price relative to book value
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
3.6% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Moderate valuation
ROE of 3.3% — below average capital efficiency
2.9% margin — thin
Earnings declined 61.7%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FRD
The strongest argument for FRD centers on P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 78.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : MT
The strongest argument for MT centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.66 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : FRD
The primary concerns for FRD are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : MT
The primary concerns for MT are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FRD profiles as a hypergrowth stock while MT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
MT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.75 — expect wider price swings.
FRD is growing revenue faster at 78.1% — sustainability is the question.
FRD generates stronger free cash flow (5M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
FRD scores higher overall (63/100 vs 52/100) and 78.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock
BASIC MATERIALS · STEEL · USA
Friedman Industries, Incorporated is engaged in the steel processing, pipe fabrication and processing, and steel and pipe distribution businesses in the United States. The company is headquartered in Longview, Texas.
Visit Website →ArcelorMittal SA ADR
BASIC MATERIALS · STEEL · USA
ArcelorMittal owns and operates steelmaking and mining facilities in Europe, North and South America, Asia and Africa. The company is headquartered in Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
Compare with Other STEEL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?