WallStSmart

TechnipFMC PLC (FTI)vsGeospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TechnipFMC PLC generates 10002% more annual revenue ($10.19B vs $100.89M). FTI leads profitability with a 10.6% profit margin vs -28.9%. GEOS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.77. FTI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FTI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.18

GEOS

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.18
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTISignificantly Overvalued (-81.9%)

Margin of Safety

-81.9%

Fair Value

$38.92

Current Price

$69.02

$30.10 premium

UndervaluedFair: $38.92Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GEOS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTI2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
32.2%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 32 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
93.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 93.9% YoY

GEOS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.778/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

FTI4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
8.2x4/10

Trading at 8.2x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.592/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.182/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

GEOS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$99.60M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-21.5%2/10

ROE of -21.5% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-30.9%2/10

Earnings declined 30.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTI

The strongest argument for FTI centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 11.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : GEOS

The strongest argument for GEOS centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.77 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FTI

The primary concerns for FTI are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : GEOS

The primary concerns for GEOS are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTI profiles as a value stock while GEOS is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

FTI carries more volatility with a beta of 0.69 — expect wider price swings.

FTI is growing revenue faster at 11.6% — sustainability is the question.

FTI generates stronger free cash flow (277M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FTI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 47/100) and 11.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TechnipFMC PLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

TechnipFMC plc is involved in oil and gas projects, technologies, systems and services. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Geospace Technologies Corporation

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Geospace Technologies Corporation designs and manufactures instruments and equipment used in the oil and gas industry to acquire seismic data for the purpose of locating, characterizing and monitoring hydrocarbon producing reservoirs. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?