WallStSmart

TechnipFMC PLC (FTI)vsKodiak Gas Services, Inc. (KGS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TechnipFMC PLC generates 648% more annual revenue ($10.42B vs $1.39B). FTI leads profitability with a 11.3% profit margin vs 5.8%. FTI trades at a lower P/E of 27.3x. FTI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FTI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 1.28

KGS

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.7Profit: 6.0Value: 4.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.76
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTISignificantly Overvalued (-89.0%)

Margin of Safety

-89.0%

Fair Value

$41.17

Current Price

$76.34

$35.17 premium

UndervaluedFair: $41.17Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KGS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTI2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 36 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
40.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 40.6% YoY

KGS5 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Operating MarginProfitability
34.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 34.2%

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.1%8/10

Revenue surging 21.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 23.3% YoY

Areas to Watch

FTI4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.3x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
9.2x4/10

Trading at 9.2x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.592/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.282/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

KGS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.4%3/10

ROE of 5.4% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.8%3/10

5.8% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
72.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-100.74M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTI

The strongest argument for FTI centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : KGS

The strongest argument for KGS centers on Operating Margin, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 21.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FTI

The primary concerns for FTI are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : KGS

The primary concerns for KGS are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 72.8x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTI profiles as a value stock while KGS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

KGS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.89 — expect wider price swings.

KGS is growing revenue faster at 21.1% — sustainability is the question.

FTI generates stronger free cash flow (488M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FTI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 54/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TechnipFMC PLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

TechnipFMC plc is involved in oil and gas projects, technologies, systems and services. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Kodiak Gas Services, LLC provides contract compression infrastructure services for the oil and gas industry in the United States. The company is headquartered in Montgomery, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?