WallStSmart

TechnipFMC PLC (FTI)vsKLX Energy Services Holdings Inc (KLXE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TechnipFMC PLC generates 1525% more annual revenue ($10.19B vs $627.30M). FTI leads profitability with a 10.6% profit margin vs -11.7%. KLXE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.34. FTI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FTI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.18

KLXE

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 8.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.98
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FTI.

KLXEUndervalued (+56.3%)

Margin of Safety

+56.3%

Fair Value

$5.35

Current Price

$2.10

$3.25 discount

UndervaluedFair: $5.35Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTI2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
32.2%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 32 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
93.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 93.9% YoY

KLXE2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Debt/EquityHealth
-3.4610/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

FTI4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
8.2x4/10

Trading at 8.2x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.592/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.182/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

KLXE4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$44.78M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-374.6%2/10

ROE of -374.6% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.0%2/10

Revenue declined 6.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTI

The strongest argument for FTI centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 11.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : KLXE

The strongest argument for KLXE centers on PEG Ratio, Debt/Equity. PEG of 0.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FTI

The primary concerns for FTI are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : KLXE

The primary concerns for KLXE are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTI profiles as a value stock while KLXE is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

KLXE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.80 — expect wider price swings.

FTI is growing revenue faster at 11.6% — sustainability is the question.

FTI generates stronger free cash flow (277M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FTI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 30/100) and 11.6% revenue growth. KLXE offers better value entry with a 56.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TechnipFMC PLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

TechnipFMC plc is involved in oil and gas projects, technologies, systems and services. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

KLX Energy Services Holdings Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. provides well drilling, completion, production and intervention services and products to the onshore oil and gas producing regions of the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?