WallStSmart

TechnipFMC PLC (FTI)vsLeishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (LSE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TechnipFMC PLC generates 20985% more annual revenue ($10.19B vs $48.34M). FTI leads profitability with a 10.6% profit margin vs 2.6%. FTI trades at a lower P/E of 27.1x. FTI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FTI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.18

LSE

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 3.5Value: 4.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.27
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTISignificantly Overvalued (-81.9%)

Margin of Safety

-81.9%

Fair Value

$38.92

Current Price

$69.02

$30.10 premium

UndervaluedFair: $38.92Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for LSE.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTI2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
32.2%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 32 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
93.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 93.9% YoY

LSE3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0810/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.2710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

FTI4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
8.2x4/10

Trading at 8.2x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.592/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.182/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

LSE4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$67.25M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.6%3/10

2.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

Operating margin of 2.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTI

The strongest argument for FTI centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 11.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LSE

The strongest argument for LSE centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : FTI

The primary concerns for FTI are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : LSE

The primary concerns for LSE are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 49.4x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTI is growing revenue faster at 11.6% — sustainability is the question.

FTI generates stronger free cash flow (277M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FTI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 28/100) and 11.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TechnipFMC PLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

TechnipFMC plc is involved in oil and gas projects, technologies, systems and services. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. is a prominent player in the clean energy industry, specializing in the production and distribution of innovative solar and wind power solutions. The company utilizes cutting-edge technologies to optimize renewable energy efficiency, directly addressing the increasing global demand for sustainable energy sources. With a strong dedication to decarbonization and environmental responsibility, Leishen Energy presents a compelling investment opportunity for institutional investors aiming to participate in the sustainable transition and benefit from the rapid evolution of the energy sector.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?