WallStSmart

TechnipFMC PLC (FTI)vsNine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TechnipFMC PLC generates 1782% more annual revenue ($10.19B vs $541.44M). NINE leads profitability with a 11.5% profit margin vs 10.6%. FTI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FTI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.18

NINE

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -1.75
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTISignificantly Overvalued (-81.9%)

Margin of Safety

-81.9%

Fair Value

$38.92

Current Price

$69.02

$30.10 premium

UndervaluedFair: $38.92Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NINE.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTI2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
32.2%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 32 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
93.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 93.9% YoY

NINE2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
46.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 47 in profit

Areas to Watch

FTI4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
8.2x4/10

Trading at 8.2x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.592/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.182/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

NINE4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$451.03M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-13.6%2/10

Revenue declined 13.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTI

The strongest argument for FTI centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 11.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : NINE

The strongest argument for NINE centers on Price/Book, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : FTI

The primary concerns for FTI are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : NINE

The primary concerns for NINE are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTI profiles as a value stock while NINE is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

NINE carries more volatility with a beta of 2.48 — expect wider price swings.

FTI is growing revenue faster at 11.6% — sustainability is the question.

FTI generates stronger free cash flow (277M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FTI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 52/100) and 11.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TechnipFMC PLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

TechnipFMC plc is involved in oil and gas projects, technologies, systems and services. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Nine Energy Service, Inc.

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Nine Energy Service, Inc. is an onshore completion service provider focusing on the development of unconventional oil and gas resources in the North American basins and internationally. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?