WallStSmart

TechnipFMC PLC (FTI)vsProPetro Holding Corp (PUMP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TechnipFMC PLC generates 763% more annual revenue ($10.19B vs $1.18B). FTI leads profitability with a 10.6% profit margin vs -1.1%. FTI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FTI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.18

PUMP

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.10
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTISignificantly Overvalued (-67.0%)

Margin of Safety

-67.0%

Fair Value

$39.02

Current Price

$67.39

$28.37 premium

UndervaluedFair: $39.02Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PUMP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTI2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
32.2%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 32 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
93.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 93.9% YoY

PUMP2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.199/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FTI3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

PEG RatioValuation
2.592/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.182/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

PUMP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.80B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-1.3%2/10

ROE of -1.3% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-24.7%2/10

Revenue declined 24.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTI

The strongest argument for FTI centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 11.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PUMP

The strongest argument for PUMP centers on Debt/Equity, Price/Book.

Bear Case : FTI

The primary concerns for FTI are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : PUMP

The primary concerns for PUMP are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTI profiles as a value stock while PUMP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

PUMP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.72 — expect wider price swings.

FTI is growing revenue faster at 11.6% — sustainability is the question.

FTI generates stronger free cash flow (277M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FTI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 31/100) and 11.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TechnipFMC PLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

TechnipFMC plc is involved in oil and gas projects, technologies, systems and services. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

ProPetro Holding Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

ProPetro Holding Corp. The company is headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?