WallStSmart

TechnipFMC PLC (FTI)vsProPetro Holding Corp (PUMP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TechnipFMC PLC generates 798% more annual revenue ($10.42B vs $1.16B). FTI leads profitability with a 11.3% profit margin vs -1.1%. FTI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FTI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 1.28

PUMP

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.10
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTISignificantly Overvalued (-72.8%)

Margin of Safety

-72.8%

Fair Value

$41.28

Current Price

$71.32

$30.04 premium

UndervaluedFair: $41.28Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PUMP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTI2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 36 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
40.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 40.6% YoY

PUMP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FTI3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Price/BookValuation
8.6x4/10

Trading at 8.6x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.592/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.282/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

PUMP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.28B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-1.3%2/10

ROE of -1.3% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.2%2/10

Revenue declined 6.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTI

The strongest argument for FTI centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : PUMP

The strongest argument for PUMP centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : FTI

The primary concerns for FTI are Price/Book, PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : PUMP

The primary concerns for PUMP are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTI profiles as a value stock while PUMP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

PUMP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.78 — expect wider price swings.

FTI is growing revenue faster at 9.0% — sustainability is the question.

FTI generates stronger free cash flow (488M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FTI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 31/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TechnipFMC PLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

TechnipFMC plc is involved in oil and gas projects, technologies, systems and services. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

ProPetro Holding Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

ProPetro Holding Corp. The company is headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?