WallStSmart

Fortive Corp (FTV)vsMicrovision Inc (MVIS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fortive Corp generates 157741% more annual revenue ($4.16B vs $2.63M). FTV leads profitability with a 13.9% profit margin vs 0.0%. FTV earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

FTV

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.00

MVIS

Avoid

25

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: -11.08
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTVSignificantly Overvalued (-443.1%)

Margin of Safety

-443.1%

Fair Value

$10.81

Current Price

$54.78

$43.97 premium

UndervaluedFair: $10.81Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MVIS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTV2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

MVIS2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.8%8/10

Revenue surging 26.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FTV4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
6.4%3/10

ROE of 6.4% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.6%2/10

Earnings declined 2.6%

MVIS4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$241.45M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTV

The strongest argument for FTV centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MVIS

The strongest argument for MVIS centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 26.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FTV

The primary concerns for FTV are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : MVIS

The primary concerns for MVIS are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTV profiles as a value stock while MVIS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MVIS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.13 — expect wider price swings.

MVIS is growing revenue faster at 26.8% — sustainability is the question.

FTV generates stronger free cash flow (336M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FTV scores higher overall (54/100 vs 25/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fortive Corp

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

Fortive is an American diversified industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington.

Visit Website →

Microvision Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

MicroVision, Inc. develops lidar sensors used in automotive safety and autonomous driving applications. The company is headquartered in Redmond, Washington.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?