WallStSmart

GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock (GENK)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 4486% more annual revenue ($9.59B vs $209.10M). QSR leads profitability with a 10.0% profit margin vs -1.9%. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

GENK

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.49

QSR

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GENKUndervalued (+58.2%)

Margin of Safety

+58.2%

Fair Value

$4.28

Current Price

$1.92

$2.36 discount

UndervaluedFair: $4.28Overvalued
QSRUndervalued (+25.4%)

Margin of Safety

+25.4%

Fair Value

$94.75

Current Price

$72.66

$22.09 discount

UndervaluedFair: $94.75Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GENK1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

QSR3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
100.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.0% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
25.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
25.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.9%

Areas to Watch

GENK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$63.29M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-28.9%2/10

ROE of -28.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.0%2/10

Revenue declined 6.0%

QSR2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.902/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
4.191/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GENK

The strongest argument for GENK centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.28 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : GENK

The primary concerns for GENK are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 13.45 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.19 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GENK profiles as a turnaround stock while QSR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

GENK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.79 — expect wider price swings.

QSR is growing revenue faster at 7.3% — sustainability is the question.

QSR generates stronger free cash flow (169M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (68/100 vs 30/100). GENK offers better value entry with a 58.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. operates restaurants in California, Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada, New York, and Texas. The company is headquartered in Cerritos, California.

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?