WallStSmart

Graham Holdings Co (GHC)vsMynd.ai, Inc. (MYND)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Graham Holdings Co generates 2241% more annual revenue ($4.91B vs $209.80M). GHC leads profitability with a 5.9% profit margin vs -36.6%. GHC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

GHC

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.27

MYND

Avoid

23

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -1.63
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GHCSignificantly Overvalued (-145.2%)

Margin of Safety

-145.2%

Fair Value

$452.34

Current Price

$1070.23

$617.89 premium

UndervaluedFair: $452.34Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MYND.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GHC4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.2710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
16.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

MYND1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

GHC4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.4%4/10

0.4% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
6.5%3/10

ROE of 6.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.9%3/10

5.9% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
4.042/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MYND4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$18.81M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.0%2/10

ROE of -2.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GHC

The strongest argument for GHC centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : MYND

The strongest argument for MYND centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : GHC

The primary concerns for GHC are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : MYND

The primary concerns for MYND are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 11.88 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GHC profiles as a value stock while MYND is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

MYND carries more volatility with a beta of 4.60 — expect wider price swings.

GHC is growing revenue faster at 0.4% — sustainability is the question.

GHC generates stronger free cash flow (-3M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GHC scores higher overall (51/100 vs 23/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Graham Holdings Co

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · EDUCATION & TRAINING SERVICES · USA

Graham Holdings Company is a diversified global media and education company. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.

Visit Website →

Mynd.ai, Inc.

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · EDUCATION & TRAINING SERVICES · USA

MYnd Analytics, Inc. is a predictive analytics company primarily in the United States. The company is headquartered in Mission Viejo, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?