WallStSmart

Graham Holdings Co (GHC)vsProcter & Gamble Company (PG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Procter & Gamble Company generates 1666% more annual revenue ($86.72B vs $4.91B). PG leads profitability with a 19.2% profit margin vs 6.0%. GHC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.04. PG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

GHC

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.27

PG

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GHCUndervalued (+3.2%)

Margin of Safety

+3.2%

Fair Value

$1145.59

Current Price

$1150.00

$4.41 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1145.59Overvalued
PGSignificantly Overvalued (-37.3%)

Margin of Safety

-37.3%

Fair Value

$107.17

Current Price

$146.46

$39.29 premium

UndervaluedFair: $107.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GHC4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.2710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

PG5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$342.51B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
31.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
23.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.03B8/10

Generating 3.0B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

GHC4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.4%4/10

0.4% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
6.5%3/10

ROE of 6.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
6.0%3/10

6.0% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
4.042/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

PG1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.082/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GHC

The strongest argument for GHC centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : PG

The strongest argument for PG centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.2% and operating margin at 23.1%.

Bear Case : GHC

The primary concerns for GHC are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : PG

The primary concerns for PG are PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GHC profiles as a value stock while PG is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

GHC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.79 — expect wider price swings.

PG is growing revenue faster at 7.4% — sustainability is the question.

PG generates stronger free cash flow (3.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PG scores higher overall (61/100 vs 46/100), backed by strong 19.2% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Graham Holdings Co

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · EDUCATION & TRAINING SERVICES · USA

Graham Holdings Company is a diversified global media and education company. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.

Visit Website →

Procter & Gamble Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a wide range of personal health, consumer health, personal care, and hygiene products; these products are organized into several segments including Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine, & Family Care. Before the sale of Pringles to Kellogg's, its product portfolio also included food, snacks, and beverages.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?