WallStSmart

Graham Holdings Co (GHC)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Unilever PLC ADR generates 928% more annual revenue ($50.50B vs $4.91B). UL leads profitability with a 18.8% profit margin vs 6.0%. GHC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.04. UL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

GHC

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.27

UL

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GHCUndervalued (+3.2%)

Margin of Safety

+3.2%

Fair Value

$1145.59

Current Price

$1150.00

$4.41 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1145.59Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for UL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GHC4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.2710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Market CapQuality
$128.81B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

GHC4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.4%4/10

0.4% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
6.5%3/10

ROE of 6.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
6.0%3/10

6.0% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
4.042/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

UL3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
11.152/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.4%2/10

Earnings declined 3.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GHC

The strongest argument for GHC centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bear Case : GHC

The primary concerns for GHC are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GHC profiles as a value stock while UL is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

GHC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.79 — expect wider price swings.

GHC is growing revenue faster at 0.4% — sustainability is the question.

UL generates stronger free cash flow (5.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GHC scores higher overall (46/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Graham Holdings Co

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · EDUCATION & TRAINING SERVICES · USA

Graham Holdings Company is a diversified global media and education company. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.

Visit Website →

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?