WallStSmart

Helmerich and Payne Inc (HP)vsPatterson-UTI Energy Inc (PTEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Patterson-UTI Energy Inc generates 14% more annual revenue ($4.66B vs $4.09B). PTEN leads profitability with a -2.6% profit margin vs -7.7%. PTEN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. HP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

HP

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0

PTEN

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 7.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

HPUndervalued (+61.3%)

Margin of Safety

+61.3%

Fair Value

$88.57

Current Price

$39.83

$48.74 discount

UndervaluedFair: $88.57Overvalued
PTENUndervalued (+80.4%)

Margin of Safety

+80.4%

Fair Value

$43.72

Current Price

$11.58

$32.14 discount

UndervaluedFair: $43.72Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HP2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
50.2%10/10

Revenue surging 50.2% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PTEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

HP4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Operating MarginProfitability
4.3%3/10

Operating margin of 4.3%

PEG RatioValuation
6.812/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-11.0%2/10

ROE of -11.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-98.8%2/10

Earnings declined 98.8%

PTEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
-3.6%2/10

ROE of -3.6% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-12.7%2/10

Revenue declined 12.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-97.9%2/10

Earnings declined 97.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-52.77M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HP

The strongest argument for HP centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 50.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PTEN

The strongest argument for PTEN centers on Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : HP

The primary concerns for HP are Operating Margin, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : PTEN

The primary concerns for PTEN are Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

HP profiles as a hypergrowth stock while PTEN is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

PTEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.

HP is growing revenue faster at 50.2% — sustainability is the question.

HP generates stronger free cash flow (115M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

HP scores higher overall (46/100 vs 45/100) and 50.2% revenue growth. PTEN offers better value entry with a 80.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Helmerich and Payne Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS DRILLING · USA

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. provides drilling services and solutions for exploration and production companies. The company is headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Patterson-UTI Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS DRILLING · USA

Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., provides onshore contract drilling services to oil and natural gas operators in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?