WallStSmart

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling Inc (HY)vsLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 2094% more annual revenue ($77.01B vs $3.51B). LMT leads profitability with a 8.2% profit margin vs -3.3%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.01. LMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 69/100 (B-).

HY

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.45

LMT

Strong Buy

69

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for HY.

LMTSignificantly Overvalued (-48.6%)

Margin of Safety

-48.6%

Fair Value

$352.84

Current Price

$529.48

$176.64 premium

UndervaluedFair: $352.84Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HY1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LMT4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
71.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 72 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
443.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 443.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$120.98B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.92B8/10

Generating 2.9B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

HY4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.614/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Market CapQuality
$599.59M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.283/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

LMT3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Price/BookValuation
13.9x4/10

Trading at 13.9x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Debt/EquityHealth
2.341/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HY

The strongest argument for HY centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 10.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.01 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : HY

The primary concerns for HY are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.34 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

HY profiles as a turnaround stock while LMT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

HY carries more volatility with a beta of 1.65 — expect wider price swings.

LMT is growing revenue faster at 10.5% — sustainability is the question.

LMT generates stronger free cash flow (2.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (69/100 vs 38/100) and 10.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling Inc

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. designs, designs, manufactures, sells and services a worldwide line of forklift trucks, accessories and replacement parts. The company is headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?