WallStSmart

Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM)vsKennedy-Wilson Holdings Inc (KW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Iron Mountain Incorporated generates 1172% more annual revenue ($6.90B vs $542.50M). IRM leads profitability with a 2.1% profit margin vs 0.9%. KW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.10. IRM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

IRM

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 2.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.12

KW

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 7.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 0.29
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

IRMOvervalued (-10.8%)

Margin of Safety

-10.8%

Fair Value

$90.41

Current Price

$125.99

$35.58 premium

UndervaluedFair: $90.41Overvalued
KWUndervalued (+79.0%)

Margin of Safety

+79.0%

Fair Value

$46.50

Current Price

$10.90

$35.60 discount

UndervaluedFair: $46.50Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

IRM3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Return on EquityProfitability
225.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 225 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
22.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.0%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.6%8/10

16.6% revenue growth

KW1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

IRM4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.702/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
229.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

KW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$1.51B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
1.5%3/10

ROE of 1.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.9%3/10

0.9% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.7%2/10

Revenue declined 5.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : IRM

The strongest argument for IRM centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : KW

The strongest argument for KW centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.10 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : IRM

The primary concerns for IRM are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 229.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : KW

The primary concerns for KW are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 3.02 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 0.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

IRM profiles as a growth stock while KW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

IRM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.15 — expect wider price swings.

IRM is growing revenue faster at 16.6% — sustainability is the question.

KW generates stronger free cash flow (52M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

IRM scores higher overall (52/100 vs 39/100) and 16.6% revenue growth. KW offers better value entry with a 79.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Iron Mountain Incorporated

REAL ESTATE · REIT - SPECIALTY · USA

Iron Mountain Inc. (NYSE: IRM) is an American enterprise information management services company founded in 1951 and headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings Inc

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE SERVICES · USA

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. is a real estate investment company. The company is headquartered in Beverly Hills, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?